VAR: Clarity or Confusion

In its 88 years of journey, the FIFA World Cup has undergone many changes; be it the introduction of colored (yellow and red) cautionary cards in 1970 (Mexico), Penalty shootouts in 1978(Argentina), the goal line technology in 2014 (Brazil) or the recent one– the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) in 2018 (Russia).

The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) whose debut we will see at the FIFA World Cup for the first time in Russia, was previously used in 2017 Confederations Cup, Serie A, Bundesliga, MLS and at the FA Cup on a trial basis.

The introduction of VAR has been quite a debatable issue and has raised some eyebrows in the football fraternity. NTGoGoaNow elaborates the working procedure of the VAR and people’s views on the introduction of VAR on the grandest stage.

What is VAR?
The Video Assistant Referee is a group of officials who are watching the game away from the stadium and has access to every camera angle and also the goal-line technology cameras.

When is the VAR used by the on-field referee?
The VAR assists the on-field referee in taking decisions such as: awarding a goal, penalty decisions, direct red card incidents and in the cases of mistaken identity– where the on-field referee is unsure which player should be sanctioned. However, VAR can only be used if the on-field referee wants to review the decision or the VAR team can recommend one if they feel a wrong decision has been made.

How does the VAR work?
STEP 1– On-field referee requests for a review or the VAR team suggests one.
STEP 2– Video footage is reviewed by the VAR team, who advises the referee via headset.
STEP 3- Before taking the decision the referee can overturn the decision based on VAR’s advice; review the incident on pitch side monitor or stick to the original decision. OR the referee accepts the information from the VAR team and takes the appropriate decision.

#"Quote it"

I think football is about emotion. If we are going to kill emotion, it's a no go to VAR. My opinion is we have the best referees in the biggest competitions. The referee is the boss on the pitch and has the last word always. Yes, there are times where the referee makes a blunder but it is very rare. The other disadvantage with the use of VAR is that it also takes a lot of time. It breaks the game in the middle thus breaking the momentum of a side. So with the goal line technology already in place, I feel that the referee should be in full control of the game and NO to VAR.

- Gaurav Mahambre, Porvorim

VAR is a welcome addition to football long plagued by controversial outcomes; the 'Hand of God' goal being the most famous example. Critical decisions can now err on the side of caution. My only concern is that the break in play can affect the flow of the game.

- Roshun George, Margao

VAR¬ is still in its building stages. The amount of time it takes for the decision to be made takes the passion out of the game and kills the flow. Football is all about the momentum a team builds and the passion that drives the players but VAR just diminishes it. In the end, the decision of the referee is final so VAR is not needed goal-line technology is good enough. In the past, during the confederation cup final (Germany vs. Chile) it was a straight red card for the Chile defender but instead, the referee produced only a yellow in spite of taking the Video Assistance. So let the referee be the judge and the decisions are spontaneous because life isn't fair and so is football.

-Chilton Fernandes, Shiroda

There has been good as well as bad moments for VAR and is sure to be a talking point in coming months. Its aim is to make the game fairer but, the judgments are still to be taken by the referee. It will definitely help a team considering an offside goal, getting card or the exact opposite. It will help the referees to a certain extent but, in the end, it all depends on referee’s judgment.

-Raish Naik, Ponda

AUSTIN DIAS | NT GoGoaNow